Hi Ben, Rune, and other folks using Mulgara with Fedora,

Note that you can today run SPARQL queries directly against Mulgara
when it's configured to run in non-embedded ("remote") mode.  Of
course, it's also nice for people/apps to be able to count on a
repository endpoint that's SPARQL-aware, even if it's just passing
queries through to Mulgara (whether embedded or not).

Eddie Shin and I have been discussing this a bit as well.  Where we
left it last was the recognition that we'd both like to eventually rid
Fedora of it's use of Trippi (one big reason: Trippi hides Mulgara's
transaction semantics).  But right now, risearch (the servlet that
responds to RI queries in various languages) is actually implemented
as part of trippi-core.  So we'd effectively need a replacement for
risearch.  And there are some unresolved questions there.  For
example, do we just replace it with a SPARQL endpoint?  If so, what
about people who currently depend on iTQL-only features?  Or those who
only need/want SPO support?  Your reactions to these questions are
very welcome.

On the other hand, due to the way risearch works, an incremental
change to the trippi-mulgara package could enable this off the bat.
Any takers?...see
http://trippi.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/trippi/trunk/src/java/org/trippi/impl/mulgara/
and respond to the fedora-commons-developers list if interested...

Thanks,
Chris

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Benjamin O'Steen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can i second this proposal to use the SPARQL shim for Mulgara, and
> implement it for Fedora?
>
> After all, SPARQL is pretty much *the* standard for RDF querying now.
>
> Ben O'Steen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
> Rune Stilling
> Sent: Sun 8/24/2008 7:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Fedora-commons-users] Plans to support the
> Mulgara-SPARQLimplementation?
>
> Hi there
>
> Are there any plans to support the newly developed Mulgara-SPARQL
> implementation (http://mulgara.org/release.html#sparql) in Fedoras
> RISearch-interface? Or is it already supported?
>
> \Rune
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
> world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to