We're considering backporting Mulgara support from Fedora 3.0 to our 
next 2.2.x release, but we'd like some feedback from the community on 
this subject. Unfortunately, providing both Kowari and Mulgara support 
is not a feasible option, because of library dependency issues, so it is 
a one-or-the-other decision.

As Fedora 2.2.x is in maintenance mode, we are striving to limit updates 
to 2.2.x to bug fixes. Replacing Kowari with Mulgara is arguably a bug 
fix since Kowari is no longer maintained (and hasn't been for years) and 
has a number of bugs only addressed in Mulgara, but it's a significant 
enough change that we would like to hear from our 2.2.x users who are 
using a Kowari-backed Resource Index. The upgrade process for Kowari 
users should be a straightforward run of the Resource Index Rebuilder 
utility.

Notably, replacing Kowari with Mulgara will eliminate RDQL query 
support. However, I don't have a sense of how important RDQL support is 
for our 2.2.x users. There is also a slight change in handling dates 
prior to 1 AD (the patched version of Kowari included with Fedora 
followed ISO 8601:2000 Second Edition, but the latest Mulgara release 
follows XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition, which in turn 
follows the earlier ISO 8601)*.

Otherwise, moving from Kowari to Mulgara is a big win: more bug fixes, 
better stability, performance and scalability, etc. not to mention 
making maintenance (for the Fedora developers) much easier.


* See http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dateTime for more details

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to