On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, [email protected] wrote: > I'd like to stick my oar in here and be explicit about something I think > Eddie Shin is hinting at-- it's hard to think of a use case where building > FOXML is really the best way to get objects built. Using the APIs has always > been more efficient and pleasant for us. I think I can accurately claim that > all modifications that would appear in an object's FOXML representation are > supported by the SOAP API-M, and almost all are supported by the REST API-M.
Could you explain what you mean by you can't think of a use case where building the foxml is the best way to get objects built? For contrast, our use case is that our collection management system exports large batches of XML, and it's relatively simple to batch build foxml (using the provided command line or GUI tools) which can be ingested easily using the provided command line or GUI tools. -Deborah -- Deborah Kaplan Digital Resources Archivist Digital Collections and Archives Tufts University ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
