I think some of the fedora mirrors haven't caught up yet. Maybe someone's waiting for them to catch up a little.
Rob Spanton On 3/21/06, Avi Kivity <a...@argo.co.il> wrote: > > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On 3/21/06, Ralph Angenendt <ralph+fed...@strg-alt-entf.org> wrote: > > > >> I don't think so. > >> > > > > Or perhaps...the single mirror listed in the mirrorlist is acting as a > > redirect at the http server level... redirecting you to some other > > http mirror based on http server logic which we can't easily evaluate > > via normal client interaction... essentially short-circuiting the > > normal mirrorlist behavior we've grown used to in previous versions. > > I don't have a clear understanding as to expected behavior now and I > > need an explanation from the mirror infrastructure developers as where > > things stand. Something has certaintly appeared to have changed, but > > without understanding the change it will be difficult to troubleshoot. > > > > > no. we have a single mirror active, and doing a 'yum upgrade' is an > exercise in futility as after 4-5 headers the mirror will reject the > connection due to overload and yum will exit saying no more mirrors are > available. > > the corresponding file for FC4 has all the mirrors listed, someone just > needs to go and update it. > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >