On 05/28/2009 01:06 PM, Simon Wesp wrote:
Michael Fleming<mflem...@thatfleminggent.com> wrotes:
MF> Hm. interesting case.
MF> I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
MF> remotely resembling depiction here.
personally I am torn between 'go' and 'no-go'
the guidelines says:
"Content must not be pornographic, or contain nudity, whether animated,
simulated, or photographed. There are better places on the Internet to
get porn."
my pro:
this package is free of pornographic content. hotbabe isn't free of
this content.
Why quote the guidline if it clearly doesn't apply in this case?
my contra:
it helps you to get this stuff.
An instigator for a murder is guilty like the murderer himself!
Murder is a crime, pornography isn't so this comparison doesn't make much
sense. Also Firefox helps you to "get this stuff" too so if that's a reason
for banning this package then you'd have to ban a lot of other software
from Fedora too.
I don't see much of a controversy here. The package doesn't try to deceive
anyone about it's intentions and doesn't contain any objectionable material
itself.
Regards,
Dennis
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
