On Sun, 31 May 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't see it recorded in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Trademark_licensees
It doesn't fit the trademark guidelines either. While Red Hat can
legally grant a license to anyone and doesn't have to abide by the
guidelines, I would expect it to do so nevertheless. So why a special
exception for "Russian Fedora"?
There shouldn't be a special case, and it's possible that Red Hat's
distributor in Russia may have granted some sort of permision that (a)
it shouldn't have, and (b) it didn't even have the authority to grant.
The Russian-specific portions of this thread seem to have moved over
here, where I responded to a similar thread.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2009-June/msg00000.html
--Max
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
