On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:23:25 -0700 Christopher Aillon <cail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/27/2009 03:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Monday 27 April 2009 04:54:56 pm Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:15:27 +0200 > >> Karsten Hopp<kars...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> ...snip... > >> > >>> This should fix builds from a single-distribution CVS tree which > >>> you can check out p.e. with 'cvs co F-11'. This broke one year > >>> ago with Makefile.common cvs release 1.95 as those changes didn't > >>> consider the different directory layout for the > >>> single-distribution CVS tree (p.e. it is .../vim/F-11 for the > >>> complete checkout but .../F-11/vim when you check out just one > >>> single distribution) > >> Hum. I can't do a 'cvs co F-11' anymore... how do you get that part > >> working? > >> > >> (I thought we broke that in trying to make the cvs modules file > >> scale to the number of packages we have). > > > > we disabled vhecking out release modules, it was causing a huge > > slowdown in cvs actions. you can check out devel still i think but > > that is all. > > I think checking out release modules still needs to be possible. If > that means we need to use a read-only mirror to facilitate this, I'd > be okay with it, but not being able to check out a tree is a pretty > bad regression that I just ran into. For the record, it would make > doing moz security updates much more scriptable as I don't need to > rely on people telling me when their packages need to be > added/dropped to the auto rebuilds. Just a late followup to this. With some changes checked in tonight this should be possible again. a 'cvs co F-11' should get you all the F-11 branches of all packages. ;) (likewise F-9 , F-10, EL-4, EL-5 for epel). kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list