On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 17:17:07 -0400, > Jeremy Katz <ka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > we've been left in a position of maintaining it and we've added some > > real features that have been needed along the way as grub 2's progress > > has been slow at best and some of the design decisions early on were a > > I was watching them for a while to see if was something I wanted to try > and after the project went several months with no apparent commits, I > figured this was something I probably didn't want to play with. > > Depending on grub2 to have active development seems a bit risky to me. > > But, GRUB 2 development doesn't look inactive. There is a lot of discussion going on in the grub-devel mailing list [1], and their revision log in their GIT mirror (primary development is in SVN) has lots of commits listed in at least the last year for grub2 trunk[2]. [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/ [2] http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2.git?a=log
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list