I have read a lot of people voice their opinion on what they think to be a
flaw in the benchmark. How about we as a group put together a documented
benchmark process along with justification as to why those methods were
chosen to reflect "real world" scenarios and from there send it to reviewers
such as phoronix along with making it public on the wiki or $other.

I just think we could try and make an improvement for future reviews as well
as users who want to run benchmarks of their own.

Just a thought,
-Adam
(From my G1)

On Jun 11, 2009 9:23 PM, "Dennis J." <denni...@conversis.de> wrote:

On 06/11/2009 10:07 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > It may be better to engage
them, though, and try to ...
They use MP3 encoding as a "real world benchmark" of ext4:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_benchmarks&num=7

They don't seem to care what they measure or why or what the results
actually mean. Phoronix' "benchmarks" seem to be mostly about earning
Phoronix a bad reputation.

Regards,
 Dennis

-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis...
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to