On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Grumf ! that's annoying :(
>
> Thank you very much for your quick answer ! :)
>
> As I only need the CAP_SYS_BOOT, I will define it manually in the source  
> code and will remove the include, that's ugly but anyway... :/
>
> As I understood, the fix in the kernel conflicts with the workaround in  
> userspace, right ?
> I was wondering if I should notify this to the maintainer of the libcap  
> or is it already known ?
>

Someone else suggested including <sys/types.h> first, which should work
around it. That's what GNU coreutils did... (a change in the include
ordering broke it.)

Which release are you seeing this on... F-11?

cheers, Kyle

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to