On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote: > > > I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, > the > > reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix > > anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out. > > Thanks for calling it "annoying". :-/ It's people like you that make me > look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then > I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of > the broken deps checks. I'm sorry, I *do* value emails, as they let me know when something's wrong (Like fail to build from source, or broken dependencies). I don't know what I could've said instead... Repetitive? > > > Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point. > > Doesn't matter much. A "yum install beagle" on ppc64 doesn't work > anymore. Alright, I'll push the update. Sorry for calling it 'annoying'. > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos Sitio: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
