Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> writes:
> IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are usually
> ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and
> with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!)
> is enough to constitute non-responsiveness on its own
You *seriously* need to get a life. The above sort of standard might be
reasonable for people who were getting paid to do Fedora packaging, but
a large fraction of Fedora packagers aren't.
(Not that kurzawa doesn't seem to be well past the threshold of
reasonable responsiveness. But people are allowed to take two-week
vacations without having to answer to FESCO for it.)
regards, tom lane
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
