On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Martin Langhoff, Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:29:48 +0200: > >> In other words, xinetd is a saviour when you are running OLPC's School > >> Servers :-) > > > > That's not the point Steve was trying to make (I guess) ... what you need > > could be easily as well accomplished by its predecessory inetd server > > I've used both. xinetd has lots of useful features (conf.d-style > config, rate limiting, etc). My understanding was that it aimed at > being a better inetd, and within those goals, it definitily does the > trick. And anyone taking on xinetd maintainership has my respect and a > few beers next time we meet. > > Maybe inetd has grown all those same features in the meantime? If it > does, the manpage I have at hand right now doesn't know about it. > > Someone have ever looked or considered Apple launchd ? > cheers, > > > > m > > > > > which does bascially the same thing (and is default on Debian for > > example, http://packages.debian.org/sid/inetutils-inetd). > > > > Matěj > > > > -- > > fedora-devel-list mailing list > > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > > > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com > mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
