On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 11:15 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 10/11/2009 03:41 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote: > > I don't think so. Not willing to put words in Jeff's mouth, but I don't > > think he was discussing the UI changes of Thunderbird. I took it as he was > > rather > > discussing the upgrade process within Fedora. > > > > So.... never ship beta software? That nixes a lot of Fedora packages. > > > FWIW, I felt the disruption in my workflow as well. All of a sudden, TB > > almost freezed my computer, eating ~ 1GB of memory (OK, I have a lot of > > emails but still) and all that, in F-11 which is a stable version of the > > distro. > > > > I think this is the right forum to discuss how we can avoid or a least > > manage users workflow disruption within stable versions of our distro. > > > > Heavily patch all TB 3.0 to act like TB 2.0? That seems silly, don't you > think?
I believe the suggestion was to make a very minor configuration change so the new behaviours were not enabled by default. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
