Eric Springer (erik...@gmail.com) said: > > It's probably abusing the system and breaks a million guidelines, but what > about making a "no-offensive-packages" package that explicitly conflicts > with a list of offensive packages?
I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal concept of 'offensive'. Heck, we might have no-offensive-packages-kde that conflicts with 'gnome-*', and no-offensive-packages-gnome... Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
