On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:39:47PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:28:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 21:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1800
>> 
>> We wanted to get some testing on the new updates repos before enabling
>> them to the world, that's why they redirects haven't been updated.
>> Hopefully we'll be good to go on those on Monday.
>
>If rel-eng wants to publish an 'empty' repo somewhere on the master
>mirror, I could have MM redirect the 'updates' repos to that empty
>repo until content is present for them.  That would avoid having it
>look like both updates and fedora repos both have identical content.

We have actual F12 updates pushed already.  Why does it need to be an 'empty'
repo?

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to