On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mr...@courier-mta.com>
wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
Mike McGrath <mmcgr...@redhat.com> writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it
before it
breaks?
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly
have broken dependencies.
Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new
future.
--
Jes
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
