I would argue otherwise, considering the flexibility of both vim and Emacs.
Personally, I like Emacs, and I have a hard time dealing with vi and its
derivatives. But, this really isn't the place to start YET ANOTHER Emacs vs.
vi[m] vs. {INSERT YOUR PREFERRED EDITOR} flamewar.Argue that on IRC, that's always more fun... ;) On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>wrote: > Debayan Banerjee wrote: > > Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs > > have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the > > distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess > > both vim and emacs should be available. > > Both vim and Emacs are obsolescent and hard to use. Kate FTW! > > Kevin Kofler > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
