On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Tim Niemueller <t...@niemueller.de> wrote:
> On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the > > potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs > > the ability to specify a Boost library suffix. It sounds like your > > package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required > > suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix. > > > > If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most > > expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on. But an upstream-worthy > > patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix. Also, -mt is a > > saner default than no suffix at all. > > The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake > which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the > Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions? > > Tim > > -- > Tim Niemueller <t...@niemueller.de> www.niemueller.de > ================================================================= > Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > Perhaps CMake needs to be updated to 2.8.0 final? I think there was a FindBoost.cmake update in 2.8.0...
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list