On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:42:06 +0100 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Jens Petersen wrote: > > In F12 we shipped yum-presto in @gnome-desktop - a kind of a > > compromise I guess. Presto/deltarpm is very useful for machines > > with low net connectivity to mirrors but enough resources to > > rebuild rpms. > > > > But yum-presto is not a desktop package at all and certainly does > > not belong in the gnome-desktop group. [1] > > +1 > > In fact, we voted in FESCo that it should be added to one of the base > groups instead (@base, I guess). It makes no sense to have it in > @gnome-desktop nor in the KDE .ks file (which is where it is at the > moment – for KDE, it's in the .ks because we refused to add it to > @kde-desktop as it has nothing to do with KDE). I guess I would be fine with it being in @base or something. We can always - it in the Xfce kickstart or any other spin that doesn't want it by default. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
