Tom Ryan wrote:
It happens to all of us...

I am still having a couple of issues though (for everyone else listening :)

I changed pamMapMethod to Entry
I then set pamIDAttr to aliasedObjectName (out of laziness for now)

When I start the slapd with this, I get this..

pam_passthru-plugin - Warning: The following suffixes listed in pamExcludeSuffix or pamIncludeSuffix are not present in this server: o=NetscapeRoot


But, the admin server will still start just fine..
The warning is just for your information, for debugging the set up, if you accidentally set an incorrect suffix. If you don't have the o=NetscapeRoot suffix on this server, or if you don't want to do pam passthru on that suffix, you can either omit it from the include/exclude list, or set the attribute pamMissingSuffix in the pam plugin entry to "IGNORE".

Regardless, the system does not appear to try to use the aliasedobjectname for the user to pass to pam.. (I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in aliasedobjectname)..
Any errors in the errors log? Does it work any better if your krbprinc name is all lower case and the realm is all upper case e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Any ideas?

Tom

Ps.. If I leave it as RDN, I get no error on startup about suffix and as long as my bind dn matches my krb princ in the default realm, it works.. So I’m halfway there?



On 7/26/06 9:18 AM, "Paul Engle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1


    *Blush* Okay, that's just plain embarrassing. That ended up being
    caused
    by having the 'auth' part in the pam configuratoin but no
    'account' line
    for pam_krb5.so.

    -paul

    - --On Tuesday, July 25, 2006 05:49:51 PM -0400 Tom Ryan
    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    >
    >
    >
    > On 7/25/06 5:47 PM, "Paul Engle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > I'm not familiar with that message. I don't recall having any
    issues. I
    > wasn't trying do add it to a live server, though. I was working on a
    > development machine and was able to yank the DS up and down with
    impunity.
    >
    >
    > In this message,
    >
    > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2006-May/msg00081.h
    > tml
    >
    > You noted you had the same error (reset required) when simple
    binding at
    > first..
    >
    > Tom



    - --
    Paul D. Engle | Rice University
    Sr. Systems Administrator | Information Technology - MS119
    (713) 348-4702 | P.O. Box 1892
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Houston, TX 77251-1892
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFEx2vHCpkISWtyHNsRAkdYAKD9mCDZCSGoG+PDcteXOttgyBZYywCfXjmM
    g1p3GL9gbu4Ja5M880MwZX0=
    =JFVj
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --
    Fedora-directory-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Reply via email to