Rich Megginson wrote: > Roberto Polli wrote: >> usually ldap isn't able to atomically delete a subtree (non-leaf). >> [..] >> If not, do you think it's an interesting feature? >> > Yes. We should investigate this as part of subtree rename.
Most LDAP servers implement this control (also supported in my web2ldap): http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-armijo-ldap-treedelete/ Ciao, Michael. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
