Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-25 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Informal package review: > ======================== > -Summary: Andika SIL fonts > +Summary: Andika is a sans serif font designed for literacy use and for > beginning readers > > * No need to be so brief, ~80 chars are usually ok for rpmlint. Actually rpmlint has a 79 column limit and your proposal is 80 Though I suppose “A SIL sans serif font designed for literacy use and for beginning readers” would be fine > -* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> > -- 1.0-1 > -Ṑ Initial packaging > +* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.0-1 the rpm maintainers will tell you anything after the mail is garbage (but it's a common mistake, even if the guidelines authorize both) > +- Initial packaging You'll take unicode out of my dead hands :) changelog is and always been UTF-8 > Seems good to me. Thanks for the review, care to do an official one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
