Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name. We have the case here of an upstream naming that's very close to our own conventions, so it's not so clear cut. But in other cases we don't hesitate to rename, so I don't see why not there. IMHO (and Debian has gone this way too lately) we'll need someday to review all our font package names to be more strict and consistent. Consistency pays big time with users and upstream namings are sadly not consistent at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
