Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 --- Comment #9 from Vasile Gaburici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-09 14:06:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Created an attachment (id=313875) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313875) [details] [details] > > upstreams version, targeted for 3.2 > > > > so upstream already has that much for layout the font displaying it, what's > > missing is the printing and pdf export portion apparently > > A problem solved a couple of year back in XeTeX. The solution is not ideal, > but > works ok in practice: CFF fonts get converted on the fly to CID-keyed Type 1 > fonts (/CIDFontType0); the embedding does not use a /FontFile3 Subtype key, > which is the direct way to embed a CFF font in a PDF. Correction: XeTeX does embed CFF fonts without conversion. I was confused because the /Subtype key comes after the (long) /CIDSet business, and it uses /Subtype/CIDFontType0C for /FontFile3, not /Subtype/OpenType. The reason why XeTeX uses /CIDFontType0C is that the /OpenType subtype requires PDF-1.6, while /CIDFontType0C works in PDF-1.3, which is what XeTeX (xdvipdfmx actually) outupts. To further add to the confusion, evince displays CFF fonts embedded with /CIDFontType0C as "Type 1C (CID)" in the font info box, while pdffonts lists them as "CID Type 0C". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list