Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |s...@lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-01-05 13:17:23 EDT --- This looks good, a variant on the multi template I hadn't seen before, but it works. Please also consider adding a dustin- prefix to the package name especially if you intend to package more fonts by the same author (This is a proposed guideline which is not official yet, so I won't block on it. However if the guideline is approved you'll earn a renaming later.) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) Anyway, the package is ⬢⬢⬢ APPROVED ⬢⬢⬢ You can continue on from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Reassigning as I've done my part. Return review of bug #475661 would be appreciated (wink wink) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
