Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-01-13 06:56:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I see. > > The current package is named tetex-font-cm-lgc. > My proposal is to name the base package cm-lgc-fonts, split into subpackages > cm-lgc-fonts-roman, cm-lgc-fonts-sans, cm-lgc-fonts-typewriter and > cm-lgc-fonts-common. The TeX specific stuff is put in a subpackage name > tex-fonts-cm-lgc (note that it is not a suffix of the main package, but I > think > the main focus of this package is the font itself rather than the enhancement > of TeX). I'd rather avoid putting the affix used to identify pure font packages in a pure TEX package, but I guess it's ok here. @spot: Another solution would be to make have all binary font (sub)packages named srpmname-fontname-font so we could have srpm cm-lgc-fonts rpm cm-lgc-fonts-common (directory ownership, licensing files and other doc) cm-lgc-fonts-fontname1-font cm-lgc-fonts-fontname2-font ... cm-lgc-fonts-fontnameX-font cm-lgc-fonts-tex (TEX parts) this way every pure font package could end in -font, and every pure tex package in -tex The only drawback is that for font packages that contain a single font family you'll have to force subpackaging and accept redundant naming like srpm gfs-olga-fonts rpm gfs-olga-fonts-olga-font But it should work in all cases and produce consistent names. Including in non-font srpms srpm openoffice.org rpm openoffice.org-opensymbol-font (Another variant for single-font packages would be to use srpm gfs-olga-fonts rpm gfs-olga-font forcing a renaming but probably not too confusing to users) There are many possible choices, and they all fail if not applied consistently, so I hope FPC settles on one before each packager chooses a different option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list