Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhb...@n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhb...@n-dimensional.de>  
2009-02-04 10:27:47 EDT ---
So far, the package names were as follows:

  SRPM: terminus-font
  RPM:  terminus-font-x11
        (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
  RPM:  terminus-font-console
        (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)

The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".

I can't see any foundry, upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", so my package would
need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?

Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
sound better and be less redundant and confusing.

Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.

But what happens with the console fonts? %{name}-console would violate the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. Or are all the
"fonts" rules only applying to X11 fonts anyway and there are no rules for
console fonts? I could do a "-n terminus-font-console" to keep the old package
name in the latter case.

Anyway, I'd really like to build the package with the console fonts in the same
source package if possible.

[1] http://www.is-vn.bg/hamster/

(Partly) related bugs:
  bug 477433: nted's "convert to new font pkg guidelines" bug
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c5
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c7
  bug 483589: current terminus-font-x11's registering of the X11 fonts broken
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589#c0

If any part of this is better discussed on fedora-fonts-list, feel free to do
so. I am subscribed there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

Reply via email to