Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-02-23 05:27:55 EDT --- Hi Minto, Thank you for looking at it. You still have several leftovers from the previous templates (defines for common directories, etc). I suggest you do a diff with the latest /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec in fontpackages-devel and try to reduce the delta. Fontpackages 1.20 should be queued for all releases but if it's not hit a mirror next to you yet you can pull it directly from koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288 Also, please rename your package to sil-padauk-fonts as has already be done for the other SIL fonts. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list