Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-02-23 12:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > How does a compat subpackage doing the same thing *not* kill modularity? Because nothing depends on the compat package, it can be removed, and new installes do not even see it exists > 8: But it does. I'll have another look at the templates. > > As far as doc changes, maybe it's just me, but I find concrete examples to be > more illuminating that templates. Could just be my learning style, but I had > more luck understanding what needed to be done (or so I thought) by looking at > the already-converted specs that at the templates. The problem with concrete example is a "pure" package is rather uncommon and blind cut & pasting results in copying quirks. But if you want to look at concrete converted packages, certainly there is no lack of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list