Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-10-27 06:58:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > fc-query/cache should also generate PK metadata for unicode blocks, so that > > when the font stack needs a glyph which is not part of an orthography, PK > > can > > search for fonts that cover the corresponding unicode block (stuff like > > symbols > > will probably never make it in an orth) > > Not a huge fan of this. Lets add orth's where missing. So if I submitted a fontconfig rfe to add an .orth for math symbols, engineering symbols, dingbats, ancient persian, etc would it be accepted? If yes what namespace should be used for those orths? I think ancient scripts have standardised ids ISO-side, but symbols? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list