Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your bpg-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 6 17
bpg-fonts bpg-algeti-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-courier-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-courier-s-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-elite-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-excelsior-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-glaho-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-ingiri-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts 1 1
bpg-fonts bpg-nino-medium-fonts 1 1
bpg-fonts bpg-sans-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-sans-medium-fonts 1 1
bpg-fonts bpg-sans-modern-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-sans-regular-fonts 1 1
bpg-fonts bpg-serif-fonts ‧ 1
bpg-fonts bpg-serif-modern-fonts ‧ 1
Total 4 16
6. Fonts that declare style attributes in family names
☛ To be properly processed by applications face qualifiers need to be
declared in style names. Some application stacks such as Microsoft WPF will
try to workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics¹, but
heuristics are brittle and pose interoperability problems with applications
that do not use them.
If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its
naming so it respects WWS conventions and does not need further
reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd
format) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem².
There may be a few false positives in this test as some common face
qualifiers can be used with a different meaning in family names.
¹ http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf
² cf the “fontpackages” remapping template; unfortunately this workaround
won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating
with other systems.
17. Fonts with partial script coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to
be
accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they
could be made useful to more people with only a little effort.
To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and
look for lines like: script-id¹(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints }
For example “mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }” means fontconfig will accept the tested
file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added.
If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary
for a particular script, report the problem upstream².
¹ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
² https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig
Please take the appropriate measures to fix the bpg-fonts package.
I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran.
Your friendly QA robot,
--
repo-font-audit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
bpg-fonts.tar.xz
Description: application/xz-compressed-tar
_______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
