Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> 2009-11-28 06:06:13 EDT --- This srpm does not build at all. Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf culmus-fancy-0.20051122 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/comix.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd culmus-fancy-0.20051122 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7: line 34: cd: culmus-fancy-0.20051122: No such file or directory RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vWyOk7 (%prep) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. It is not easy to write a multi-source srpm. It is definitely not recommended to try when you can go without. Since in your case, upstream already publishes each font set in a separate tar.gz, why don't you just do one simple mono-source srpm per tar.gz, instead of trying to force them all to collaborate in a single monster srpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
