Hi,
Don't know if you folks have considered this, but it should be possible
to parse the spec, compare the manual build requires specified with the
one auto generated by this tool and post the diff as a suggestion to the
packager as part of review-o-matic. Does that make sense?
Rahul
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:42:35PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Karsten Hopp <kars...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I've used auto-br-rpmbuild with my latest full-install mass rebuild and
> > grepped the
> > BuildRequires from the logs.
> > They are available at
> > http://karsten.fedorapeople.org/buildrequires/
>
> I'm not sure what to do with this information. For example, take a
> look at one of my packages: automaton. It's a Java package. Yet your
> logs show gstreamer-devel as a BuildRequires. How did that get in
> there? And what's going on with the 3 different versions of glibc, on
> 2 arches?
>
> I've checked a couple of my other packages and had a similar reaction.
> There are BuildRequires listed that make no sense to me. Can you
> give more detail on how these lists were generated? Thanks,
Possibly a bug, possibly because something in the configure script of
the application touches a file in gstreamer-devel. Take a look at:
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/auto-buildrequires/
There'll be a fedorahosted project of this soon.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-l...@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Fedora-india mailing list
Fedora-india@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
