On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:53:22 +0100
Till Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Do Dezember 6 2007, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> 
> > The current updates system is getting better each release, but I
> > think we should adjust our policies to also have an
> > “updates-archive” repository. This repository will include all
> > signed updates that had once lived in the updates repo, for the
> > duration of the releases life-cycle. I don't expect all mirrors
> > would want to carry this extra
> 
> Once the repositories are presto enabled, an updates-archive with all
> the delta rpms would not take as much space as a full rpm repository
> but provide the same functionality.

Yes, this is correct. I left it out of the letter due to the need for a
specific client to deal with the presto data. PyJigdo could do such a
task, if this is the route we want to go.


-- 
Jonathan Steffan
daMaestro
GPG Fingerprint: 93A2 3E2F DC26 5570 3472 5B16 AD12 6CE7 0D86 AF59

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Reply via email to