On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:56PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:04PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:33 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
> > > As explained by mmcgrath, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted
> > > projects that are
> > > not altered or updated for last six months.
> >
> > Hmmm -- this seems a little problematic. It's definitely possible to
> > have a "mature" project which doesn't see a lot of changes. Not that
> > all of these necessarily fall into that case, but some of them
> > definitely do
good point.
> yeah, like setarch. Isn't likely to change much...
Bad example. setarch(1) was merged into util-linux-ng one year ago.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
