Hello, This question is asked in the context of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for_EOL which has not already been approved by FESCO, so this could have no follow-up, though I think that this issue is also relevant for EPEL.
Till raised an interesting issue associated with adding more releases in bodhi: each release takes some place in the left menu. Another could still be right, but I think that 4 or more will certainly be problematic. Has this issue already been considered? What is the plan for EPEL when it switches to using bodhi? In addition to being there there will be in the end 3 to 5 EPEL versions in parallel so this is certainly an issue that will arise. Any comment, idea? If it ends up that for the proposal (or for EPEL) another bodhi server has to be set up, can you tell if it is easy rather easy to set up and administer or rather hard? -- Pat _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list