On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought
> > I'd ask. Can anyone explain this:
> >
> > http://pastebin.ca/1481219
> >
> > Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
> > lower hit rate?
> >
>
> The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
> have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
> are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
> would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
> a true disparity over caching.
>
I thought that exact same thing :)
memcahed1:
STAT uptime 9143
STAT get_hits 311736
STAT get_misses 11255
memcached2:
STAT uptime 9144
STAT get_hits 49679
STAT get_misses 11116
-Mike_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
