Jeremy Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > Actually, the more I think about it... is this really appropriate for all > > upstream m-i-t users? Especially since it will probably be a never-ending > > task of adjusting the symbol list to find the proper modules. > > When davej and I talked about it, we decided "probably not". And > maintaining two lists of it is insane, so we decided putting the info in > the kernel package wasn't a bad thing. Especially as that's where > you'll know when you need to change it
But that means any time the symbol list changes, you'll need to rebuild the kernel ; you effectively have a DOA kernel for the installer. If it's done at runtime, you can handle whatever kernel you happen to get, even if it's not one of ours. Bill _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
