Chris Snook wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Chris Snook wrote: >>> -CONFIG_EXT3_FS=m >>> +CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y >>> >>> I've been wondering for years why we weren't already doing this. >> see above, but I can live with it. Will we add ext4 and xfs (and >> reiserfs and jfs) too? > > Having one root-suitable filesystem built-in makes it easier to do a lot of > atypical boot configurations, which are becoming rather interesting thanks to > virtualization. If we're going to pick one, I think ext3 makes the most > sense. > I don't see a lot of benefit to building in xfs, reiserfs, or jfs, and I > think > we should definitely keep ext4 modular in its current stage of development. > > -- Chris
Yeah, I agree, that's fair. (I wasn't really too serious about linking in every fs ...) Optimizing for the common case(s) makes sense. -Eric _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
