On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Oliver Falk wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-(
> > And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it?
> >
> > Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >> This all looks fine to me.
> >
> > May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-)
> >
> > > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly
> >> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and
> >> not just someone asking for random commit access.
> >
> > Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where
> > worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently.
> >
> >> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches,
> >> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts?
> >
> > Whatever you prefer.
> >
> > Let me know, so I start working on this today...
>
> Did I miss the answer to my mail!?
Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back.
Looked ok to commit to me though iirc.
I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead.
but don't feel that you have to.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
