On Monday 20 March 2006 18:08, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 20 March 2006 14:01, Donald Maner wrote: >>> With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion to >>> gauge the amount of support for keeping FC2 updates going. >>> >>> As specified in the FAQ, Fedora Legacy will pick it up and >>> maintain it >>> for two additional Fedora Core release cycles. >>> >>> I believe FC1 still has the following to warrant continued work, >>> what about FC2? >> >> We're still out here, so count me in. > >I have one production server that's still on FC2. If FL would stop >releasing updates for FC2 I will have it reinstalled with a newer OS >(probably CentOS). Alas, as it's my only FC2 machine I can't help >with QA. > >Nils.
I'm in the same boat, the only FC2 box I have is this one, and I do not really consider it expendable. I'd feel much different if I had another box to drop onto the end of the ethernet cable & plug this 19" monitor into. But I don't. Lots of folks would call this considerably hacked up FC2 install thoroughly broken, but guess what? EVERYTHING I use everyday, for several hours of that day, Just Works(TM). >-- >fedora-legacy-list mailing list >fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
