+1 On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:50 PM, mike cloaked <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since posting via gmane seems not to have propagated through to the > main list I am sending this separately: > > Anne Wilson <cannewilson <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > Maybe they can't. Some problems can't be fixed until we get 4.1. On the > > whole, though, I agree with you. It took a little getting used to, but I > do > > like it. I'll put up with its shortcomings while it is 4.0. 4.1 is only > a > > few weeks away. > > This has been one of those threads that last and last - and it seems to me > that occasionally frustration with an issue builds up and eventually we > get these everlasting complaints sessions. > > I think everyone would probably agree that KDE4 is not perfect at present > but I feel we should accept the real experts' view that underlying this new > desktop is a concept that will eventually not just supercede the old KDE > (3.5) > but will eventually yield a lovely desktop that we will get to love > when it is polished and optimised - but it will take a little time. > > If you have ever done any programming yourself you will know that getting > optimised bug free code first time round almost never happens barring a > miracle - so let's give the devs a break and allow them a bit of time > without > too much heckling! A little praise might no go amiss at times either! > > I accept that a calculated risk was taken in including KDE as 4.0.3 in F9 > but I also accept their judgement and we may well be seeing strong praise > rather than condemnation in F10's lifetime when we reach 4.1+ or 4.2. > > As has been said a number of times - you can always stay with F8 for the > moment until KDE4 has 4.1 out the door and that will be in a month or so. > That will still be some months before F10 release by which time KDE4 should > hopefully be a really nice desktop. > > I am filing bugs in BZ when I find issues and all of us who are using KDE4 > should contribute to its development by doing this. Certainly I have found > that the few people who get changes implemented are generally very > responsive > and do a great job in either amending things for Fedora or represent Fedora > interests upstream. > > Most of the complainers do not directly fix things - so we all perhaps need > a little patience and do our bit to help rather than simply grumble. > > My 2pennyworth... > > -- > mike > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- Regards, Mustafa Qasim Lahore, Pakistan Registered Linux User# 441709.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list