> > The GPL then violates #9 in the definition > > > 9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software > > It doesn't, really. It applies to a program, and to > other works > derived from the program. It doesn't apply to works > that are merely > aggregated in the same distribution medium, without forming > a single > program under copyright law. > > --
Then how could the fork of cdrecords had to be created if it was not Restrict Other Software? http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/ What is the real explanation then? The explanations that I have read are not very convincing :( The arguments are very much red tape and political in nature :( Is this a case of a misinterpretation of the GPL? Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
