Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > Björn Persson wrote: > > Fedora isn't Linux, it's a Linux distribution, but everyone calls all > > Linux distributions "Linux", so Fedora should be called "Linux" even > > though it isn't Linux? Is that what you're saying? Unfortunately that > > doesn't help much with defining what Linux *is*. > > > > Or do you mean that Fedora isn't *equal* to Linux, it's just *a* Linux, > > but everyone calls all Linuxes "Linux"? > > It is kind of like the difference between a car, a Ford, and a > Mustang. A car does not have to be a Ford to be a car. A Ford doea > not have to be a Mustang. But it is still correct to call a Mustang > a car.
Should I take that to mean that your concept of "Linux" is the same as Thomas Cameron's, whatever his concept really is? Björn Persson -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
