> You're still talking as if your opponents want to name > entire > distributions "GNU/Linux". I'm not so sure > that there really is anyone who > wants to name entire distributions "GNU/Linux". > Are you sure that there are > people who want to do this? Do you have any evidence?
They do, take a look here http://www.getgnulinux.org/ if you click on more, see what you find http://www.getgnulinux.org/more/ http://www.gnulinuxmatters.org/about/ The wikipedia tries to explain which ones are truly GNU/Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution There is an article to the 7 most influential GNU/Linux Distributions http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/entdev/article.php/3701421 Like I have said before, it should not matter but there are many people that do take offense, if you say Linux only, they want to exert their muscle and say GNU/Linux is the appropriate name. There are no correct answers here :) Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list