Tim: >> Is it just me, or do others also think that a public email (even a >> signed one) would be almost the worst place to trust a fingerprint >> announcement?
Laszlo BERES: > If the mail is correctly signed then it's OK. A message being correctly signed isn't quite the same thing as being able to verify that it's been produced by the person in question. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
