2008/8/24 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Disclosure doesn't sabotage forensic evidence. I can tell you that there is > blood on this shoe without having any effect at all on the blood that's on the > shoe.
Actually there is a long history of police forces withholding vital details of a crime in order to, say, detect whether a person is: - a fraud, because they don't know some detail that the perpetrator of the crime alone would likely know - guilty, because they inadvertently reveal a detail that the perpetrator of the crime alone would likely know -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list