Rahul Sundaram wrote:
That's a matter of opinion. It may matter to you why your 3rd party
application doesn't run. It matters to me whether it runs or not.
It is not a matter of opinion. You claimed that if Fedora shipped
official Java, then the problems would disappear for third party
applications.
I don't think that's exactly what I said.
Oh, sure. Feel free to look up the archives.
Different conversation, I guess. Was that back when fedora was shipping
something that not only wasn't a version that would run 3rd party apps
but it also wouldn't pass any conformance tests? And you still defended
the product?
OpenNMS would be a good test.
.. which works fine.
http://yum.opennms.org/
http://blogs.opennms.org/?p=223
Errr, that blog says it builds... Is it your/fedora's policy that if
something builds you should ship it? The fedora versions that do work
work because they require this:
http://yum.opennms.org/unstable/common/jdk/i386/jdk-1_5_0_15-linux-i586.rpm
Run the latest release and if you find a actual problem, file a bug
report. Theoretical discussions are just wasting time.
Repeating other people's mistakes is what wastes time. Here's what one
of their developers said more recently:
http://n2.nabble.com/Broken-Startup-on-Fedora-9-td640408.html#a640628
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
