Antonio Olivares wrote: >--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>From: Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for >>using Fedora." <fedora-list@redhat.com> >>Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM >>On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote: >> >> >>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >>>} >>> >>># This is a very basic subnet declaration. >>> >>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 { >>> range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20; >>> option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org, >>> >>> >>rtr-239-0-2.example.org; >> >> >>>} >>> >>> >>It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice. >>And stranger >>to declare it differently. I see no point for the first >>one. >> >>-- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r >>2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686 >> >>Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox >>is ignored. I >>read messages from the public lists. >> >> > >Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one? > >I have tried before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time. > >The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to >make the server >10.154.19.0 ? > >Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server >should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing? > >Thanks, > >Antonio >
Dear You, Please try these : <>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 { range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20; option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org; } Good luck !
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines